Subject	Re: I don't think it's that the VQ is better
Posted by	gt300 on February 25, 2004 at 12:44 AM
	This message has been viewed 61 times.
In Reply To	I don't think it's that the VQ is better posted by 14yearZ on February 24, 2004 at 11:08 PM
Message	v-6 has shorter length enable front midship, allow better weight distribution, that same midship design allow lower nose up front, better areodynamic and more areodynamic possibilities which are also crucial on race track, something inline can't do, this is RB powered skyline and this is the VQ
Follow Ups	"godzilla" is dead: nismo replaced skyline with Z in JGTC - gt300 21:42:25 02/24/04 What makes the VQ better for the track? (n/m) - T0M 22:30:50 02/24/04 I don't think it's that the VQ is better - 14yearZ 23:08:20 02/24/04 gt300 stated they were better for the track. (n/m) - T0M 23:32:54 02/24/04 Re: I don't think it's that the VQ is better - gt300 00:44:29 02/25/04 v motors are also lower, not as tall, so weight is lower - ScubaSteve 10:27:29 02/25/04 Al block may weigh less (n/m) - CarlCuro 23:44:58 02/24/04 racecars are engineered for (among other things) balance - OCD-Z 13:31:08 02/25/04 I thought the skylines were already running VQ30DETTs? - KaZ (VaBch) 22:32:54 02/24/04 Uhm...this is old news? - BooZTT (Hawaii) 00:32:47 02/25/04 yeah. they have used the VQs just about all of last year in - Halo Z 05:41:25 02/25/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.